Empowerment, Not Legislation Is The Key
July 12th, 2007
Government’s decision to monitor pregnancies is a regressive step.
In a bid to check female infanticide and the worsening sex ratio, the Indian government has decided to make registration mandatory for all pregnancies. Further, abortions would now be allowed under certain circumstances.
On Thursday, Women and Child Development Minister Renuka Chowdhury told Hindustan Times that she wanted each pregnancy to be registered. “This will help to check both foeticide and infant mortality,” she said.
Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss had said on Wednesday, “We will provide facilities to conduct pregnancy tests in each village. It will help provide better healthcare facilities to mother and child.”
[link]
Abortions in India are currently governed by the Medical termination of Pregnancy Act 1971. While the act only allows termination of pregnancies (upto 20 weeks) if it would cause ”grave injury to physical and mental health of the women”, it leaves a big loophole.
Where any pregnancy occurs as a result of failure of any device or method used by any married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children, the anguish caused by such unwanted pregnancy may be resumed to constitute a grave injury to the mental health of the pregnant woman.
Since every contraceptive has a failure rate, and it is practically impossible to verify if contraceptive failure had actually occurred, abortion is virtually on demand in India.
The ease of abortion, while a significant step in gender equality has played its part in skewing the sex ratio in India. However,its effect has been vastly overestimated. The sex ratio in India has followed a largely secular trend; from 972 in 1901 to 946 in independent India’s first census in 1951. In fact, the sex ratio was already 927 in 1971 when the MTP act came in to force and has actually improved to 933 in 2001. While it must be acknowledged that India has been losing a lot of babies due to female infanticide, not all of it is due to easy availability of abortion.
This is hardly the first time the government is attempting to check female infanticide through legislative methods. The Pre-conception pre-natal diagnostic techniques (regulation and prevention of misuse) Act of 1994 banned pre-natal sex determination. However, the first conviction under this act was only handed out in 2006! In the meantime, the British medical journal Lancet has estimated that India lost as many as 5 million female babies! While a case could be made for better implementation of the law, I remain skeptical how much actual effect it would have.
And therein lies the real danger of such efforts. As experience in America has shown, banning abortion is not a long-term solution. People will obtain abortion if they want it sufficiently, and it only pushes women in the hands of quacks thus further damaging their health. Also, the right to abortion is intrinsically linked to right to privacy and is an acknowledgment that a woman enjoys primacy over her own body. While attempting to curb female infanticide, the government is actually damaging gender equality. it also ignores that merely ensuring the birth of the female child is not enough. Apart from post-natal killings which are rampant in certain parts of India, what sort of upbringing she would have in a family which was ready to abort her merely because of her sex. It is quite likely that such a family would show little interest in her education and thus perpetuate this cycle of deprivation. Also, As activists are already pointing out, it would be practically impossible to gather data and it would only empower the babus
There is little doubt that the skewed sex ratio in India represents a major challenge. In fact, according to the 2001 census, the sex ratio among 0-6 age group is even worse and falling rapidly. This indicates that the problem of female infanticide may actually be getting worse. What would be the way forward? Here again the census data is illustrative. Kerala which has a female literacy rate of 87.4% has the best sex ratio in India. Contrast this with Punjab, economically a much more developed state where the sex ratio is 876 or urban Delhi (821). The key to saving female babies is empowering mothers; ensuring education and economic independence for them. This is frequently dismissed as long term measure. That is not always true, districts in Punjab by launching a concerted campaign with involvement of the local people and medical professionals have shown a drastic improvement in as little as five years. Unless women are the primary decision makers when it comes to matters of their own body, there is little hope of improvement.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
9 Responses to “Empowerment, Not Legislation Is The Key”
Empowerment, Not Legislation Is The Key « Life is a street car named Desire July 13th, 2007 at 12:00 pm #
[...] Read the rest on Policy Wise. [...]
Random Thoughts: A Feministic Take By The Lord! July 13th, 2007 at 1:41 pm #
Born a libran July 13th, 2007 at 6:59 pm #
I totally agree with your conclusion that the only way out is for the women to start feeling independent and South India has started reaping the benefits of the independent woman. But I would think that Delhi would have a high literacy rate and in my experiences with Chennai and Mumbai, women are much more independent and free in Mumbai (but this is from personal experience and is hence, skewed). What are the comparative numbers for literate men and women in the south and in places like Delhi, Chennai, and Mumbai?
Anurag July 13th, 2007 at 11:05 pm #
I agree that it is going to be a utopian exercise but at times I wonder what are the options available.
If one can get a strong tap on diagonostic centres which determine the sex of foetus, it can work. But that we have been trying for years without much success. The issue that the girl will enter the cycle of deprivation if she is given an unwanted birth is not very convincible. If thats a reason for opposing the step, we have already being trying to do it by checking sex determination.
So I would like to wait and watch. At least something is better than nothing.
Rohit July 14th, 2007 at 1:53 pm #
Born A libran,
It is not only education but also economic independence. I don’t have the figures for Mumbai and Chennai but overall Delhi’s literacy rate is higher than TN and Karnataka–which is perfectly understandable since we are comparing a state with a city. But if you look at Delhi’s society, a lot of women especially in rich business families might be educated but they are not working. It is questionable if their state is any different from uneducated women.
Anurag,
The problem is that the government has simply failed to address the issue of logistics. There are roughly 18 million pregnancies in India every year, how will the government monitor each of them? More importantly, at what stage it would become intrusive?
I am not a great fan of legislating to control individual behaviors.
chandni July 16th, 2007 at 3:15 am #
great post Rohit.
I would definitely like to add on a few bits regarding the right to abortion and the confusion between PCPNDT and MTP!
May be a short post following ur thread will be good!
Rohit July 19th, 2007 at 12:04 pm #
Chandni,
Please go ahead. Look forward to it.
Policy Wise » Why Sex determination Should Be legal In India September 20th, 2007 at 8:02 pm #
[...] Policy Wise has argued before, the key to saving babies is empowering mothers; ensuring female education; and equal economic [...]
Policy Wise » Banning Abortion is Counter-productive October 13th, 2007 at 3:28 pm #
[...] RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!Policy Wise has in the past pointed out that it is futile to regulate women’s reproductive choices. A new study by the World Health organization brilliantly illustrates this point, “We now have a [...]