<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War on India&#8217;s Academic Institutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://policywise.net/2007/12/04/the-war-on-indias-academic-institutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://policywise.net/2007/12/04/the-war-on-indias-academic-institutions/</link>
	<description>Policy Matters</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Do IIMs Deserve Subsidies? : Retributions</title>
		<link>http://policywise.net/2007/12/04/the-war-on-indias-academic-institutions/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>Do IIMs Deserve Subsidies? : Retributions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policywise.net/2007/12/04/the-war-on-indias-academic-institutions/#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>[...] Reality Check further argues that IIM have repudiated their original agenda&#8211;after all, they are &#8221;government aided institution in a developing country.&#8221; But that is precisely why this increase is justified. Why should the taxpayer, in a poor developing country, where millions have no access to primary education, fund the expensive education of a few hundred? That they are government owned is immaterial; the correct response in that case would be to free them from stifling government control and force them to generate their own resources. Their dependence on the government funding has only meant constant political interference. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reality Check further argues that IIM have repudiated their original agenda&#8211;after all, they are &#8221;government aided institution in a developing country.&#8221; But that is precisely why this increase is justified. Why should the taxpayer, in a poor developing country, where millions have no access to primary education, fund the expensive education of a few hundred? That they are government owned is immaterial; the correct response in that case would be to free them from stifling government control and force them to generate their own resources. Their dependence on the government funding has only meant constant political interference. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
